Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03598
Original file (BC 2014 03598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03598

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Albuquerque, NM to San 
Antonio, TX.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She applied for a change in state residency and HOR during her 
in-processing with her unit in San Antonio and was under the 
impression that she had completed all the necessary paperwork.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the applicant’s AF Form 133, Oath of Office 
(Military Personnel), on 24 Feb 95, she was appointed to the 
grade of second lieutenant (2Lt, O-1) in the Regular Air Force 
in Albuquerque, NM. 

According to the applicant’s AF Form 766, Extended Active Duty 
Order, dated 18 Apr 95, Albuquerque, NM is reflected as her HOR.

The applicant is currently serving on active duty.   


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPANF2 recommends denial.  After a thorough review of the 
applicant's military personnel record and other supporting 
documentation, there appears to be no error or injustice 
regarding the applicant’s HOR.  Joint Federal Travel Regulation 
Volume I, Appendix A1, states in part that a HOR is the place 
recorded as the individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, 
enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty unless 
there is a break in service of more than one full day.  Only if 
a break in service exceeds one full day may the member change 
the HOR.  Any correction must be fully justified and the home, 
as corrected, must be the member’s actual home upon entering the 
Service, and not a different place selected for the member's 
convenience.  The applicant did not have a break in service of 
more than one full day; therefore, a change to her HOR is not 
authorized.
	
The complete DPANF2 evaluation, with attachments is at Exhibit 
B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 23 Dec 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-03598 in Executive Session on 13 May 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                   , Panel Chair
	                        , Member
	                  , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-03598 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Sep 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPANF2, dated 12 Nov 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Dec 14.

						

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02328

    Original file (BC 2014 02328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02328 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 7a – Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD), be corrected to reflect “San Antonio, Texas”. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00320

    Original file (BC 2014 00320.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00320 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 7a, Place of Entry into Active Duty (PLEAD), and Item 7b, Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect College Station, Texas. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05176

    Original file (BC 2013 05176.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05176 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Albuquerque, NM. The place recorded as the home of the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned, appointed, enlisted or inducted, or ordered into...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01422

    Original file (BC 2014 01422.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01422 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her place of entry on active duty (PLEAD) be corrected to reflect Knoxville, Tennessee (TN). As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01367

    Original file (BC 2014 01367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his appeal, the applicant provides his Michigan state medical license; internship completion certificate from the hospital he was trained; a letter of acceptance for residency upon completion of his military commitment; his travel order for a flight physical showing he resided in Rochester Hills, MI; and a copy of his AF IMT 766, Extended Active Duty Order. Block 5 of the AF IMT Form 766 lists Mawdan, ND as his “Home of Record.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02827

    Original file (BC 2013 02827.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) reflects Navarre, FL, rather than O’Fallon, IL. The applicant’s HOR remained the same during his active duty service time (22 June 1983 through 30 September 1992). Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 December 2013.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 04246

    Original file (BC 2014 04246.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04246 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home or Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect San Antonio, Texas on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. According to the AF Form 768, Extended Active Duty Order, the applicant commissioned with the Regular Air Force on 14 Aug 04. The applicant’s military personnel record was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01307

    Original file (BC 2014 01307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01307 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her late husband’s Home of Record (HOR) be changed to San Antonio, TX. The Board should find it in the interest of justice to consider her untimely request so that his daughter may utilize military educational benefits. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00074

    Original file (BC 2014 00074.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He requested that his HOR and POE be changed after his last reenlistment on 13 Jan 96 because at that time, he was a legal resident of San Antonio, TX. According to item 7(a) of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his POE at time of entry reflects “Springfield, MA.” According to item 7(b), his HOR at time of entry reflects “Hartford, CT.” AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00791

    Original file (BC 2014 00791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00791 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was...